Dozier Internet Law on Trademark

tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57842321442965949062012-01-19T12:25:20.705-05:00Dozier Internet Law on TrademarkInternet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.comBlogger421100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-21519576424340973332012-01-19T12:13:00.003-05:002012-01-19T12:25:20.715-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: January 2012 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.STRONG INDUSTRIES, INC. v. JANNIC, INC.MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (TAMPA)8:11-CV-02819-VMC-TGWFILED: 12/22/2011The consequences for “cybersquatting” are substantial. You could be liable for up to $100,000

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-90977521594919157472011-12-22T13:25:00.004-05:002011-12-22T13:30:12.014-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: December 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.TIFFANY, LLC v. YAOQIANG, ET AL.SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (MIAMI)1:11-CV-24116-UUFILED: 11/15/2011Major companies are stepping up their efforts at enforcing their intellectual property rights.Tiffany is

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-28699507533836401982011-11-15T15:25:00.003-05:002011-11-15T15:28:34.314-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: November 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.YAHALA TRADING COMPANY, LLC v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, ET AL.EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN (DETROIT)2:11-CV-14794FILED: 10/31/2011We have seen a number of cases in which trademark infringement reports were

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-36771018441757078482011-10-31T10:15:00.005-04:002011-10-31T10:20:29.533-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: October 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.CARGROUP HOLDINGS, LLC v. COOPS CARS, LLCDISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (TRENTON)3:11-CV-05697FILED: 9/30/2011Part of the benefit of monitoring trademark registrations is to pick up on a potential conflict. In this

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-9206987983538375742011-09-28T16:46:00.001-04:002011-09-28T16:48:39.803-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: September 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.STATE BAR OF WISCONSIN v. LEXISNEXISWESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN (MADISON)3:11-CV-00586FILED: 8/19/2011Keep in mind that there is no easy way to learn of all trademarks and that is why a “trademark

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-43459436224622227142011-08-04T15:06:00.001-04:002011-08-04T15:08:29.772-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: August 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.APRIL I. GARDNER and STYLEMINT, LLC v. BEACHMINT, INC., ET AL.DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS (BOSTON)1:11-CV-11307FILED: 7/22/2011Even the Olsen twins are not doing a good job clearing trademarks, it appears.

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-61351020588241391002011-07-06T12:25:00.001-04:002011-07-06T12:27:49.093-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: July 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P. v. JAMES M. BIRDNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS (CHICAGO)1:11-CV-04352FILED: 6/27/2011This is a very typical misuse of a trademark. Just place the trademark in your content and

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-68767509199488690002011-06-13T14:53:00.002-04:002011-06-13T14:56:46.726-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: June 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.THE LEARNING COMPANY, A DIVISION OF HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT PUBLISHING COMPANY and HMH CONSUMER COMPANY LTD. v. ZYNGA INC.DISTRICT OF MASSACUSSETTS (BOSTON)1:11-CV-10894FILED: 5/18/2011Joint development

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-33353869852515059702011-05-05T15:11:00.001-04:002011-05-05T15:13:26.259-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: May 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.PINEHURST, LLC v. US GOLF TRIPS, LLCMIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA1:11-CV-00296FILED: 4/15/2011Most people would think that the name of a geographic location is not trademark protectable. This is a good

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-20114590800757519372011-04-21T12:23:00.002-04:002011-04-21T12:27:37.760-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: April 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.FREIGHTQUOTE.COM, INC. v. FREIGHT-BASE SERVICES, INC., ET AL.NORTHERN DISCTRICT OF ILLINOIS (EASTERN DIVISION)1:11-CV-02121FILED: 03/28/2011This case is a perfect example of a business getting a trademark

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-22666588949263728012011-03-29T11:30:00.001-04:002011-03-29T11:31:41.383-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: March 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.AIR802, LLC v. AMAZON.COM, INC.WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON (SEATTLE)2:11-CV-00341FILED: 2/25/2011It is hard to believe that Amazon would intentionally use a trademark and sell a competing product. If it

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-25881456394525337692011-02-22T13:57:00.003-05:002011-02-22T14:13:30.583-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: February 2011 - Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law Disclaimer The facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.GREENBERG SMOKED TURKEYS, INC. v. VALUECLICK, INC.EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS (TYLER)6:11-CV-00038FILED: 1/20/2011Sometimes these automated programs for building advertisements can get you in trouble.

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-41179490774200722892011-02-16T11:36:00.001-05:002011-02-16T11:39:06.581-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: January 2011 - Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.SELECT MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, LLC, ET AL. v. D AND D MARKETING, INC. and DMITRY FOMICHEVCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES)2:10-CV-10008FILED: 12/29/2010There certainly exist some defenses to keying

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-35435176013514897122011-02-09T10:39:00.002-05:002011-03-28T13:53:22.075-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: December 2010 - Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law Disclaimer The facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute. SHAR PRODUCTS COMPANY v. JUSTSTRINGS.COM, INC. EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN (DETROIT) 2:10-CV-14540 FILED: 11/15/2010 SHAR PRODUCTS COMPANY v. GOSTRINGS, LLC EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN (DETROIT) 2:10-CV

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-7118907395878713952011-02-02T12:35:00.000-05:002011-02-02T12:38:01.762-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: November 2010 - Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.THE KEY WEST TOURIST DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION v. ZAZZLE, INC.SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (KEY WEST)4:10-CV-10100FILED: 10/26/2010Fantasy Fest is a huge party around Halloween each year in Key West featuring

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-34948983473477847242011-01-26T10:24:00.001-05:002011-01-26T10:26:37.315-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: September 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.1-800 CONTACTS v. BRANDAN HARNER d/b/a 1800CONTACTS-COUPON.COMCENTRAL DISTRICT OF UTAH2:10-CV-00927FILED: 9/20/2010If you are an affiliate marketer you must abide by the contract of the advertiser. If

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-61250601237665615932011-01-18T14:22:00.002-05:002011-01-18T14:24:51.302-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: August 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. VALUE CITY FURNITURE, INC.NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS (CHICAGO)1:10-CV-05413FILED: 8/26/2010If you are going to use comparative advertising make sure that the

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-7829127822835165632010-08-20T11:46:00.001-04:002010-08-20T11:49:03.374-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: July 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.1-800 CONTACTS v. STANDARD OPTICALCENTRAL DISTRICT OF UTAH2:10-CV-00643FILED: 7/13/2010We see several of these lawsuits each month. Do not key your pay-per-click ads off of a trademark of a competitive

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-72930420675788070742010-08-10T11:19:00.001-04:002010-08-10T11:21:46.873-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: June 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.QUIBIDS LLC v. JOHN DOEWESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (OKLAHOMA CITY)5:10-CV-00639FILED: 6/21/2010There are a lot of disputes today as to what extent copying (copyright infringement) or to what extent

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-31122832796559965512010-06-28T11:41:00.001-04:002010-06-28T11:46:47.464-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: May 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. TEFLON BLOOD RECORDS, INC. AND TEFLON BLOOD INCORPORATEDCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES)2:10-CV-03908FILED: 5/25/2010Make sure you get formal trademark

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-68140490061967761642010-05-19T11:35:00.002-04:002010-05-19T11:38:45.001-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: April 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.DRIVETIME AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. AND DRIVETIME SALES AND FINANCE COMPANY, LLC v. LEAD DISPATCH INTERNATIONAL, INC. d/b/a COMMUNITY AUTO CREDITDISTRICT OF ARIZONA (PHOENIX)2:10-CV-00950FILED: 4/29/2010Just

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-24042929414631707192010-04-07T09:07:00.002-04:002010-04-07T09:12:22.518-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: March 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law Disclaimer The facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.LOANS OF AMERICA FL, LLC v. RAPID AUTO LOANS, LLC, ET AL.SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (FT. LAUDERDALE)0:10-CV-60416FILED: 3/19/2010It is fairly well understood that you cannot key ads off a competitor’s

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-28698268207999229942010-03-19T10:10:00.001-04:002010-03-19T10:12:48.209-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: February 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.ADG, LLC v. GREAT EXPRESSIONS DENTAL CENTER, P.C. AND TRACIE BATTLEEASTERN DISTICT OF MICHIGAN (DETROIT)2:10-CV-10813FILED: 2/26/2010Every business needs to be aware of the developing use of information by

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-23354574108568865472010-03-16T11:52:00.002-04:002010-03-16T11:57:58.463-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: January 2010 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.BAIDU, INC. AND BEIJING BAIDU NETCOM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. v. REGISTER.COM, INC.SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (FOLEY SQUARE)1:10-CV-00444FILED: 1/19/2010A big part of this case is Baidu’s claim

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-82848851478639172902010-01-26T12:31:00.003-05:002010-01-26T13:18:03.992-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: December 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.CASCADE YARNS INC v. CRAFTS AMERICANA GROUP INCWESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON (TACOMA)3:09-CV-05800FILED: 12/30/2009This is another reminder that trademark infringement lawsuits for merely keying a

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-1233287736818543092009-12-30T09:29:00.001-05:002009-12-30T09:32:22.446-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: November 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.DOCTOR’S ASSOCIATES INC. v. SUBWAY.SY LLC AND HANI KOTIFANIDISTRICT OF MINNESOTA0:09-CV-03148FILED: 11/09/2009The registration of the subway name in Minnesota reflects a fundamental problem with state

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-74289131928137598802009-11-25T15:02:00.002-05:002009-11-25T15:07:04.477-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: October 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.HAPPY FEET USA, INC. v. BESTSOLE, INC.MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (ORLANDO)6:09-CV-01710FILED: 10/07/2009It is pretty clear all across the country that the use of a trademark to key a competitor’s ad is

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-19007145816457380622009-10-15T10:39:00.002-04:002009-10-15T10:45:50.840-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: September 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.PANDORA JEWELERS 1995, INC. v. PANDORA JEWELRY, LLCSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (FT. LAUDERDALE)0:09-CV-61490FILED: 9/18/2009Once again the breakdown of geographic boundaries and limitations has reared its

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-90913711712345031252009-09-30T10:08:00.001-04:002009-09-30T10:10:42.606-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: August 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.PRESTIGE ADMINISTRATION, INC. v. US FIDELIS, INC. and CRESCENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLCDISTRICT OF ARIZONA (PHOENIX)2:09-CV-01804FILED: 8/28/2009This is another example of a hotly debated legal arena and

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-33473788294451065032009-08-17T10:09:00.003-04:002009-08-17T11:10:52.248-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: July 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law Disclaimer The facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute. GOOGLE INC. v. JOHN BECK AMAZING PROFITS, LLCNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)3:09-CV-03459FILED: 7/28/2009This is a fascinating lawsuit attempting to attack a class action suit in which the

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-21378793836744836272009-07-06T15:19:00.001-04:002009-07-06T16:01:32.815-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: June 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.THOMAS PUBLISHING COMPANY AND THOMAS INDUSTRIAL NETWORK, INC. v. INDUSTRIAL QUICK RESEARCH, INC., ET AL.SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (FOLEY SQUARE)1:09-CV-05541FILED: 6/16/2009The alleged misconduct in

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-88277527211990141362009-06-12T13:54:00.003-04:002009-06-12T13:58:04.229-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: May 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.ADVANTAGE MEDIA GROUP v. SMART DISCIPLINE, LLC, ET AL.MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA (BATON ROUGE)3:09-CV-00320FILED: 05/29/2009As a business person you must understand that this type of an ad is becoming a

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-10924319208277151142009-05-26T15:33:00.001-04:002009-05-26T15:35:20.189-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: April 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.UNITED STATES GOLF ASSOCIATION v. ISAAC SCORING SYSTEMS, LLC.DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (TRENTON)3:09-CV-01848FILED: 4/17/2009This case is the perfect example of the challenge faced by a trademark holder in

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-31702759183920251252009-04-17T14:29:00.002-04:002009-04-17T14:35:56.264-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: March 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.ALLSTAR MARKETING GROUP, LLC AND FELKNOR VENTURES, LLC v. YOUR STORE ONLINE, LLC, ET AL.CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES)2:09-CV-02094FILED: 3/26/2009Another keyword advertising case. Yes, it is

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-31179738458216489422009-03-20T09:30:00.003-04:002009-04-17T13:48:45.990-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: February 2009 Trademark Infringement Cases

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute. VIDEO PROFESSOR, INC. v. CAMERON MONTGOMERYDISTRICT OF COLORADO (DENVER)1:09-CV-00417FILED: 2/26/2009I have blogged about this issue extensively and I have included a chapter on this phenomenon of

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-92159975945463007912009-02-12T14:12:00.004-05:002009-02-13T09:59:43.998-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: January 2009 Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.QUICK FITTING, INC. v. G.A. MURDOCK, INC.DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND (PROVIDENCE)1:09-CV-00044FILED: 1/30/2009This is another lawsuit over keyword trademark infringement in which a competing ad is presented

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-57948219411585666262009-01-09T15:50:00.001-05:002009-01-09T15:52:37.324-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: December 2008 Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.BED BATH & BEYOND INC. AND BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO., INC. v. FIXEDCREDITNOW, ET AL.DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (NEWARK)2:08-CV-06406FILED: 12/30/20081-800 CONTACTS v. MEMORIAL EYECENTRAL DISTRICT OF

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-60184767328422014472008-12-18T15:05:00.003-05:002008-12-18T15:08:22.185-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: November 2008 Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.J2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND CALL SCIENCES, INC. v. ZILKER VENTURES, LLC AND CHOOSEWHAT.COM, LLCCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES)2:08-CV-07470FILED: 11/12/2008I recently blogged about some

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-10993197494606768602008-11-21T11:23:00.009-05:002008-11-21T11:55:41.456-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: October 2008 Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.OMAHA STEAKS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. RAEMICA, INC., ET AL.CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES)2:08-CV-06975FILED: 10/22/2008This issue of the use of a business or product name by a competitor on its

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-71717212984053071152008-10-21T15:51:00.009-04:002008-11-07T11:55:09.539-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: September 2008 Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute.GARY LEON TETER, JR. v. GLASS ONION, INC.WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI (ST. JOSEPH)FILED: 9/23/20085:08-CV-06097The two alleged instances of intellectual property misconduct, taken together, are a big

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-57947751799237595292008-09-25T14:37:00.029-04:002008-11-07T13:29:15.981-05:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: August 2008 Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law DisclaimerThe facts are unproven allegations of the Plaintiff and all commentary is based upon the allegations, the truthfulness and accuracy of which are likely in dispute. HARRY AND DAVID v. HOUDINI, INC.DISTRICT OF OREGON (MEDFORD)1:08-CV-03088FILED: 8/15/2008 This is another pay-per-click keyword search lawsuit with a couple of nuances. First, there is use of the

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5784232144296594906.post-27723165961980580102008-09-17T09:56:00.002-04:002008-09-25T15:08:23.841-04:00Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report: Trademark Infringement Lawsuits

Dozier Internet Law and John W. Dozier Jr., Esq. have now moved the online version of the Dozier Internet Law Federal Court Report to the blogging environment. We'll continue to maintain the historical case filings and comments issued prior to September 1, 2008 on the main Dozier Internet Law website. This blog focuses exclusively on trademark infringement lawsuits. Enjoy...and stay informed!

Internet Lawyer: Dozier Internet Lawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16727063998177973350noreply@blogger.com0